Criminal Defense of Immigrants



 
 

§ 19.31 (B)

 
Skip to § 19.

For more text, click "Next Page>"

(B)  Constitutionality.  Counsel should investigate whether the particular statute defining the child pornography offense is unconstitutional, either on its face or as applied.  In Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition,[385] for example, the Supreme Court held that a portion of the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 violated the First Amendment right to free speech in defining child pornography to include “virtual pornography,” not produced using actual children.[386]  Therefore any conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A based upon such materials is also unconstitutional.  


[385] Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234, 122 S.Ct. 1389 (2002).

[386] 18 U.S.C. § § 2256(8)(B), (D).

 

TRANSLATE