Post-Conviction Relief for Immigrants



 
 

§ 7.106 (F)

 
Skip to § 7.

For more text, click "Next Page>"

(F)  Improper Inference from Exercise of Right to Remain Silent.  A defendant retains his or her right against self-incrimination at the sentencing hearing and the court is not allowed to draw any adverse inferences from an invocation of the right to remain silent, except, perhaps in evaluating departures based on acceptance of responsibility.[372]

 


[372] Mitchell v. United States, 526 U.S. 314, 119 S.Ct. 1307 (1999).

Updates

 

Other

POST CON - GROUNDS - SENTENCE - JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT TO CONSIDER INAPPROPRIATE FACTORS AT SENTENCE
At sentencing, the court sometimes makes legal errors. In addition, the judge sometimes takes into account inappropriate considerations in imposing sentence, to which counsel must object or the error is normally waived. See People v. Scott, 9 Cal.4th 331, 353 n.16 (1995)(defense counsels failure to object to sentencing errors bars raising those errors on appeal except for errors considered jurisdictional). For example, it is judicial misconduct to make negative remarks about the defendant being on welfare and fathering children out of wedlock. People v. Bolton, 23 Cal.3d 208, 217 (1979). The court may not threaten to have the defendants castrated. United States v. Duhart, 496 F.2d 941 (9th Cir. 1974) (judge stated he could put defendant in same room with husbands of sex offense victims and possibly cut "something" out of the defendants body).

 

TRANSLATE